Three years ago, I had a revelation as a research
communicator. I was at a session in a
science conference and, looking around, I noticed that several people nearby
were using Twitter. It’s not that I
didn’t know about Twitter – as a university communicator I make it my business
to be familiar with all new communications technologies, and I had started
experimenting with it myself about a year and a half earlier. But I was surprised (shocked, actually) that
a medium dedicated to one-sentence messages had broken through so rapidly into
the professional world of science and science journalism. The people around me
were simultaneously writing about the talk that we were all listening to,
passing comments back and forth to each other, passing on news about what the
talk to people who were not at the conference, and generally turning the
academic lecture we were attending into an occasion for public and private
engagement.
At that point I realized that the nature of formal communication
itself was rapidly changing. It was
still about passing information from one person to another, but it now had a
broader element to it that was encouraging people not just to send messages to
people they know, but to broadcast messages to a broader public. Further, it
wasn’t just about talking – it was about encouraging a conversation – it was
about engagement.
Here’s why I was shocked by this: through most of my career,
most academics I had encountered actually distained
the idea of engagement. (Translation: they hated talking to the public.,
unless, of course, they were students.) In my job, I would have to cajole
research faculty to talk to reporters, and plead with them to bring their
research down to street level. (It’s not for nothing that they call the
university “the ivory tower.”) Yet here they were, broadcasting what they were
thinking to the wind and actively encouraging response – actively engaging in
public conversation. Something had really changed.
As a research communicator, I decided at that point that I
clearly needed to embrace this too. I sought out faculty at UNC Charlotte who
were already actively using social media, and we collaborated in developing
workshops in using these tools. Whereas
my job as a professional communicator had always been to take researchers’
work, write about it myself and disseminate that writing, I realized that now
part of my work would have to be helping faculty learn how to do some of that
themselves: engagement requires two-way communication, and it can’t happen if a
writer stands between the public and the researcher.
Our university culture has since rapidly changed along these lines. This
year, one of our faculty, Dr. Greg Gbur in Physics and Optical Science, had his
work selected for the
2012 edition of the “Best Science Writing Online” – a real honor,
distinguishing him as one of the nation’s top science communicators. Dr. Gbur
blogs about his work and his related interests, and does it very successfully,
as do several other members of UNC Charlotte’s faculty (see our blog roll for
other examples). A little later this week, we will be sharing a guest blog from
Dr. Anita Blanchard in Psychology, a blogger herself, whose research involves
probing the social psychology that drives these new media. As we engage, we
also study the cause and effect of engagement.
The
culture of the world has kept changing along with us. These days, most major
commercial enterprises never advertise without including the statement “find us
on Facebook and Twitter,” and hope not just to sell to their customers, but to
engage with them and develop stronger relationships. Tonight, the last of the 2012 Presidential
Debates will be broadcast, and one of the first questions asked reporters on
all of the post-debate coverage will be “what was the conversation like on
Twitter, Tumbler and the blogs?” Expect to see the chair of our political
science department on Twitter tonight–
Dr. Greg Weeks, a guest recently on this blog – engaging. You can follow
him now at @gregweeksuncc .
[Note: I just learned after posting that Dr. Weeks is in Chile doing research, so I guess we won't see his tweets tonight after all. JH]
[Note: I just learned after posting that Dr. Weeks is in Chile doing research, so I guess we won't see his tweets tonight after all. JH]
No comments:
Post a Comment